26 April, 2014

Culture Clash - Rulers versus the Ruled

My mini-clash

When I worked for the church, I went through a "hatting" program that was very extensive. Hatting is the process of bringing an employee up to speed on the administrative aspects of his job - paperwork - legal requirements - etc. It was considered important for every staff member to be familiar with the pattern of the entire organization and all the standard processes for handling things such as communication between staff members, technical goofs on post, ethical lapses and how to report them, basics of how to handle the public.

In my new job at a medium-sized electronics and engineering firm, they also have a staff hatting program. The founder of this company was very interested in getting as many employees as possible to buy into the goals and values of the company. He thought this would make better, more effective, happier employees. He also decided to make his company employee-owned. So we are all actually employee-owners. There are a lot of parallels here to how the church is run and managed.

But the current vision of what it means to train an employee at my company is far inferior to what we did at my church. For one thing, LRH wrote extensive hatting materials for church staff members. The founder of my current firm made no such effort. So the training department relies on third-party materials that seem to fit the company vision. But of course, those materials cannot cover details peculiar to our particular company or industry. So these materials, for many reasons, come up short.

I wanted to know how "my" company was organized. So I asked my supervisor where I could get an organization chart for the company. "Oh, you meant a command chart," he replied. No, I meant an organization chart. It didn't even need to have names on it. Just the pattern of the organization. So I could see how the various individual actions that result in production were grouped together. He couldn't find such a chart. But he found someone in HR (Human Resources - the division that hires and fires) that was willing to show me what she had. She arranged for me to meet her in her office, and when I arrived she had for me a legal size piece of paper with boxes full of names and lines drawn between them. This was better than nothing, but when I described what I was hoping for, she didn't seem to understand what I was talking about. I asked her why something like this was not available to the staff, and she told me, basically, that the way Manufacturing is organized is considered a company trade secret.

Understanding the clash

I pulled back, trying to understand what was happening here.

I knew I would run into something like this. But where did it come from? Why was everyone so complacent about it?

I decided to analyze the situation in terms of the rulers and the ruled. There was also, broadly speaking, a third group involved. These could be called the advisers. Both the rulers and the ruled sought guidance from this third group.

To reiterate some basic assumptions:

I use what I call "The Model"which assumes an individual is a spirit animating a body through a mind.

The way people respond to various situations is largely determined by where they sit on the Tone Scale. This is an experimentally-derived scale developed by LRH as a tool for diagnosis and analysis. People down the scale identify more with physicality. People up the scale identify more with true spirituality.

While people tend to park themselves on the Tone Scale due to whatever material in their case is the most active, they can also be educated to approach certain subjects with certain responses typical of a certain Tone Scale position.

This is particularly true of the the subject of management (ruling) and being managed (being ruled). A higher-toned approach would prefer that the ruled be well-informed, as they could be trusted to assist management assuming they had adequate data to operate on.  A lower-toned approach would prefer ignorant workers, as all well-educated workers do is rise up and try to overthrow existing management.

The higher-toned approach corresponds to the vision of the Founders of the United States. A lower-toned approach corresponds with the European ruling classes they were trying to free themselves from.

I call the higher-toned approach "rule of thought" because it assumes that in the end reason will prevail. I call the lower-toned approach "rule by force" because it assumes people would be inactive if they were not "motivated" by some physical threat.

Why does Rule by Force dominate?

One might better ask: Why would anyone want to rule over others to begin with?

A game consists of FREEDOM, BARRIERS and PURPOSES.
This is a scientific fact, not merely an observation.

(LRH: Scientology: Fundamentals of Thought, p54)

The fact that games exist is a fundamental reason that life looks interesting to people. Games work when all the players agree on the three elements listed above. If an individual or group is not willing to agree on these points, they become an enemy to the game. Such individuals or groups must somehow be guarded against, and ejected if they try to crash a game. Most individuals playing these games, by experience, feel ill-equipped to play the role of "umpire."  They ask, appoint, demand - even plead - with those who for some reason feel more capable to be the umpires in the game.

And thus arises the role of "manager" or "ruler." It is not an easy role to assume. In order to coax some people to take this role, they usually have to be rewarded with some form of higher status or special privileges.

Is this role needed? Most, by experience, would answer "yes." Can this role be abused? Of course it can. Can this role be secretly subverted? Yes, it can.

For reasons that are mostly technical (case-related) certain beings find themselves simply unable to play the games that most agree are acceptable and worthwhile. These aren't necessarily low-power beings. They are just beings who can't get along with people. They play their own games, and in most places these games are known as "crime." These games are secretive, destructive, and often violent. They are often aimed at replacing management, as good managers are a real problem for the criminals. And so management gets pounded down into resorting to force against the criminals. And this results in "rule of force" being taught as the winning way to be a manager.

What about the advisers?

In times lost in the mists of antiquity, we hear of magicians advising kings.

Though today this setup seems a bit fanciful, the fact is that it is still the basic arrangement.

A more careful study of history than most are willing to stomach reveals that the role of "adviser" on earth probably originated off-planet in the form of various ET groups interfering with Earth for their various own purposes (games).

From the viewpoint of an earth human, the ET was certainly on the level of a magician, if not a god, for no other reason than that ET could fly through the air in ships.

ET also had superior weapons and all kinds of mind-control technologies - per numerous reports based on human memory and the stories about ET left behind on earth.

The fact that we (earth beings) were also capable of having these technologies and abilities was something that most of us simply did not consider, and of which few - if any - ETs were willing to inform us. However, for various reasons, certain earth people thought that they could duplicate the "magic" of the ET and use it themselves for various purposes. These individuals created "secret societies" of all kinds to protect the "sacred knowledge," both from attacks from ETs and from ruling classes created by ETs to manage things on earth. These societies included the "Magi" (magicians) and many others. Many of them actually cultivated considerable psychic abilities amongst themselves. They knew that if they lowered themselves to ruling positions, the temptation to resort to force would destroy their abilities. So they became the advisers of earth rulers.

These advisers knew that thought was actually superior to force in any situation, but did not have the technical horsepower to effect force directly through thought. Thus, though they counseled the managers to defer to thought whenever possible, they could not eliminate the habit to use force on people, and the basic management distrust of the worker.

We can include among these advisers the great religious names on earth. The Buddha - a very real person, certainly preached the rule of thought. Jesus - whoever that really was - was likely greatly influenced by Buddhism and simply adapted its teachings to the situation he found in the Middle East at that time. And so the list goes on. The concept of "rule of thought" was kept alive in Europe during the Dark Ages by various monastic orders, and then burst forth during the Renaissance as "science." Of course, scientists were often used by rulers to help them design better weapons. Not all scientists even thought that "rule of thought" was workable. The connection to the ancient ET technologies had been lost as academia expanded into the population. "Rule of thought" persisted, but was weakened.

And so civilization on earth went down-tone-scale, and some criminals were able to take advantage of the situation and infiltrate various governmental and academic institutions.

Today on earth we have many managers listening to criminals posing as advisers. The message is rather appealing to them in that it certainly includes a basic distrust for the free individual. It ramps up secrecy big-time and couches what it can't keep secret in a "double speak" language so profoundly confused as to just barely communicate anything at all. But meanwhile, the ruled - a bit more uptone than the rulers due to their dislike for playing that role - are suffering greatly. And nothing can be done about this situation apart from trying to educate the ruled up to the point where they are able to postulate new games that will begin to work for them again.

Is all lost?

There are many today quite convinced that Earth has had it. That before the end of this century we will be back in the stone ages using clubs, axes and bows and arrows. If humanity survives on earth at all.

Certain segments of the ruling groups - call them "factions" if you will - have re-discovered the ET connection to earth (since by many reports they visited here in person after we blew up Hiroshima, if not earlier than that). The public are discovering this, too. And some of these factions seem to be making an effort to use various ET-related stories to gain support for certain actions or policies that have yet to be publicly implemented.

There are a LOT of stories!

Some of them seem very hopeful.

But I doubt them.

How has any ET group been able to avoid the mechanism that is taking down Earth?

If anything, wouldn't they be more susceptible to these mechanisms than we are?

According to LRH research, all the most active ET societies of the past were heavily into mind control to spur action and prevent revolt. Their attempts at conquest in order to keep their games alive seem almost mindless in their disrespect for the sovereignty of the individual. And their willingness to artfully lie rivals anything we have seen thus far from criminals here on earth.

However, there is always the possibility that a "new" group has arisen in this universe and is making its way forward. A group composed of individuals well up the Tone Scale who are perfectly willing to be ruled or rulers as the need requires. And very able at both roles. Only by going up Tone Scale could any individual or group rise above our current situation. And this would be very hard on an individual alone, so it is almost certainly a group that has accomplished this together - if such a group exists.

For those of us not privy to the details of current exopolitics, we can at least search out technologies here on earth designed to elevate individuals on the Tone Scale, and use them to the greatest extent we are able.

There will always be better games to play; we just have to invent them.

21 July, 2013

Thinking with The Model

My article on The Model

My original intention in presenting "The Model" was to introduce the LRH/Scientology viewpoint on human life and integrate it with modern technology concepts, especially in the area of Computer Science and Robotics.

But The Model is for a human system, and for the basic building block of human groups, the individual. So now it is time to introduce some ideas in the realm of the humanities, or human life, that follow from using The Model.

For better or worse, I am writing this "on the fly" and will probably not touch on every aspect of this subject that I considered when I first thought of writing this.

Engineering principles can be applied to human systems.

Human systems can be designed as terminals, or nodes, connected together by lines, or paths, or segments, on which particles, or information, flows and changes.

The result will be most predictable when the exact purpose of every terminal is known and clearly spelled out. In mechanical systems, this is often handled - it is thought - by the name of the terminal ("boiler" or "50-ohm resistor") but this only works in machines because they change so little once built, so only the designer has to know the actual purpose of every terminal and process (sequence of terminals) in his or her design.

In human systems, people have to be trained to play their part in those systems. They don't just instinctively know what a "technician" or a "supervisor" is. They have to be trained. So the designer of the system has to spell out the purpose of each terminal in the system, and what it does to the particles it receives. Then people can be trained on those write-ups. To omit such write-up, think that simple descriptive labels are enough data, or think someone else will develop full write-ups later when they have the time, is a totally irresponsible thing for the designer of a human system to do.

In fixing human systems, you must first know what they were designed to do. You must then know how they are supposed to operate, in other words, what actions each terminal in the system is suppose to perform, resulting in what products or sub-products (also known as changes to the particles). Then you look for terminals that are not doing what they are supposed to be doing. In human systems, such people a called "unhatted" "untrained" or "liars" or "criminals." This same approach is used in fixing machine systems, as I have mentioned before. But in human systems, you are dealing with human beings instead of mechanical parts. You can't just throw away and replace a non-functioning human being. You have to handle them to honestly do their job, or honestly do some other job. You can't have dishonest terminals in a human system, just like you can't have mislabeled parts in a machine system. The system just won't work with such parts.

Humans are more flexible than machines.

You can assign a person to cover more than one terminal in the human system. Most people are perfectly capable of this. To show just one terminal on an organizing chart just because there is only one person there is foolish, as it would be in a diagram of a machine system. A person is quite capable, normally, of controlling quite complex systems, such as his own body. But in a human system, if you want that person to get the products that the system was designed to produce, then you must specify exactly how this is to be done, so that the person in charge of that area can learn how to run it.

In a human system, every person in the system is a manager.

To deny management technology, management data, or management tools to any member of a human organization is to reduce the potential survival of that group. To function well, people must be able to manage other people and the tools and machines in their area. And this, too, is a skill that must be learned, and should be taught to every person in the group, not just the "managers."

To see a person as just a "worker" in a group, or just "labor" is to ignore The Model. The Model tells us that a person IN NOT HIS BODY. The body is a biological machine that must be maintained and controlled just like any other machine. There is a technology to this that can be learned. There is a skill to this that can be improved. But the one doing the learning and the improving is NOT the body, it is the being. To ignore this fact is to court death at every turn. To embrace this fact is to step onto the road of creating a true group, made up of able beings who are totally aware of their separate identities as beings and that their bodies and their jobs are games they are playing, not prisons they are trapped in.

Machines cannot be responsible for their own actions; beings are.

There is no cause point worth mentioning here above or beyond the level of the being. Thus, what happens happens because beings cause those things to happen. There is really no such thing as "fate" "chance  or "luck." There is just awareness of true cause, or lack of it. Just as knowledge of true (root) cause (or the real why) is necessary to fix or improve a machine system, so is it vitally necessary to fix or improve a human system. And this begins by recognizing every being as a cause point. These are, ultimately, the ONLY CAUSE POINTS IN THE SYSTEM. Though this becomes a bit esoteric when one considers the weather, earthquakes or other "natural" events, there is no motion anywhere in existence that was not originally created by some living being. We attribute the cause of such events to God, or Mother Nature, or The Spirits. But this is simply because these systems (the weather, planets, even bodies) were designed to run on their own without much, if any attention paid to them by the people who use them. That they all are, ultimately, our designs is worth keeping in mind, even if it is not a fact that can be practically applied to every situation.

Human problems are complex, but can be handled.

Workable handlings (technologies) derive from proper use of The Model.

They may not be easy or quick, but they are possible. The average person is unaware of The Model and of his or her actual position relative to the mind and body. It can take considerable time and work to render a person aware of these things. It takes even more time and work to train people to use the various technologies derived from The Model to improve conditions.

But it is possible.

The technologies I refer to are the technologies of Scientology. There may be other workable technologies, but if so, I am not aware of them. In Scientology we have, at least, a set of technologies that are written up, that can be learned and taught, and that do, when used correctly, produce desired results.

What many of us have recently realized is that, even here in the US, many of our leaders, managers, designers, and people we trusted with operating our various human systems have been lying to us and stealing from us. One thing they are lying to us about is The Model, and the people who developed it and use it. They insist it is wrong and that those new leaders are evil. But these people cannot be trusted to give us accurate data about such things because they have turned criminal. They have become the liars of our current human systems. They are the people who are not actually doing their jobs.

They turned criminal because of their own weaknesses, lack of awareness, and lack of training. To begin to set things straight, these people must be rehabilitated or replaced by people who are rehabilitated. If replaced with "ordinary" people, those new leaders, managers and designers will likely succumb to the same pressures to go criminal that so many of the current batch have already succumbed to. These people require more awareness, more skill and more ability than they had before to stand up to the pressures of designing and managing the complex human systems that we are now involved with and apparently want. If they do not advance as beings, we will all more than likely be forced to revert to more primitive lives where we may get some chance, eventually, to have another shot at getting it right. Or, we might not.

In My Universe, thinking with The Model is not an option. It is a necessity. The survival of the individual, the family, our groups, our ecosystems, our planet, and even the universe as we know it depends on thinking with, and using the technologies derived from, The Model.

04 May, 2013

LRH Speaks Out - Individual's relationship to the group

...the primary error a fellow can make when he's trying to take an objective, is say you're going to jump off from someplace and not be there yet.

(Lecture given on 11 October 1951, Thought Emotion and Effort lecture transcripts, lectures 1-10, p 188.)

LRH ends this lecture by telling his students that he thinks they can bring each other up to the point where they are ready and able to do something effective in society.

One of the biggest failings of leadership on Earth (and perhaps everywhere else as well) has been that most "leaders" have not in fact been able, if even willing, to lead.

Most people spend most of their lives, essentially, fighting with themselves, regardless of what they appear to be fighting.

I started getting interested in this particular lecture on page 173 of the transcript where he says:

Man is living in a society that is too safe for him - much too safe for him. He's getting something like a peacetime army: "All sergeants will act towards soldiers like big brothers. You do not have to salute your officers."

The human body is made to meet sudden death and overcome it two or three times a day. For eons, boa constrictors and saber-toothed tigers, and so forth, have been jumping out of trees and from behind rocks.

Without this stimulus Man sort of becomes introverted.

Maybe nobody just plain had enough guts to come out and say, "The second I state that an individual should be in free and complete command of himself, the second I say that an individual should be given back into his own command and thereafter operate on the lines of his own experience, I am postulating that I will now have to live in a world of individuals who cannot be bludgeoned or beaten into instantaneous, blank obedience. And also, I am abdicating from any throne over the tops of individuals."

Then he started talking about what the West did to Russia after the Bolshevik revolution.
Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War

Now we sit around and say, "Here we are. We're not aggressors. We're just trying to make the world safe for democracy."

Doesn't this sound a lot like what is still happening today?

And he says of that Russian citizen:

He's fighting for the kind of freedom for the people of Russia which we earned so doggoned long ago we've almost forgotten it and almost thrown it away.

Doesn't that sound like what is still happening today?

LRH spotted some problems that this planet has not yet come to grips with!

01 November, 2012

Monkey in the Middle

What is the U.S. military really up to?

A well-armed, well-trained fighting force is a huge political asset.

It should come as no surprise, then, that the various major political players on a planet would seek to control the major military groups on that planet. And the most sophisticated military group on earth is the U.S. Military.

There are old stories of political shenanigans between the various services. Though this could be seen as simply a matter of pride for the various officers and service members involved, it may in fact be an indication of other forces at work.

The Navy, with its land fighters, the Marines, is the service constitutionally mandated to stay established on a continuing basis. It makes some sense, then – and many hope that this is true – that the Navy for the most part stands for Constitutional principles and is the least swayed by attempts to pull it off-purpose. On the other hand, the Navy is rumored to be in charge of the Space Command, a deeply secret military arm that maintains a fleet of off-world “ships” complete with crews and advanced weapon, energy, and navigational systems.

The army, on the other hand, was meant to be composed of temporary recruits or conscripts for emergency military activities, such as repelling a foreign invasion. It is aligned with the National Guard, which was intended to provide a unifying structure under which the state militias would operate.

The Army was “professionalized” after the Vietnam war. It was also upgraded with the expansion of “special forces” units, an initiative which formally started in 1950. These units were trained in Psychological Operations, in addition to regular combat, advanced combat techniques, and intelligence operations.

The Air Force, with its control over NORAD and the rest of the land-based nuclear warhead delivery system, is considered the most hawkish of the 3 major services, and may be the most divided.

While most stories portray the Navy as non-criminal but very secretive and the Army as confused but basically pro-Constitution, the Air Force remains a bit of a mystery. Its ability to mete out pure destruction is vast, so there is some cause for concern.

Of course, we seldom if ever hear from actual officers from these branches about what is really going on in their areas. However, we do hear from some, as well as several enlisted men, mostly retired. It is difficult to know, however, whether these “sources” are delivering truth or propaganda.

Beyond these, we have a slew of internet commentators, as well as a few mainstream reporters, that claim to have “inside sources” feeding them “intel” for “patriotic” purposes. I will include a sampling of this “intel” below, and you can tell me what you get out of it. On top of this, there are additional internet commentators who claim to be getting data from ET sources, instead of, or in addition to, human sources.

Why do I care?

I got involved in this mess through a desire to communicate with these various internet personalities and their followers about Scientology. Around 1952, Hubbard had started to discover off-world (mostly past life) experiences in his patients that seemed authentic. A between-lives station on Mars was discovered. Using exteriorization techniques and drills that today are considered too rough for most students, Ron and a few of his students left earth, exterior, to check out some of this stuff. He also located ancient incidents involving advanced off-planet cultures, and implied that some of these were still active.

In the 1960s Hubbard hired some private investigators to find out more about his political enemies, and they ran into what could only be called a “conspiracy” involving certain psychiatrists, the World Federation of Mental Health, international bankers, major media outlets, and politicians which those men controlled. He reported his findings to Scientologists in 1967, and announced the formation of the Sea Organization as his best attempt to evade these enemies, protect the church, and continue his spiritual research.

Anyone who has heard that 1967 speech is aware that, according to LRH, a global conspiracy of a fascistic nature exists and has been working on its plans for hundreds of years. If they have studied his other materials, they are also aware that there may be an ET connection involved. However, LRH admonished his students to stay on-purpose and not waste too much time trying to expose or fight this conspiracy. It would fail in due course, he said, and sooner if we do our jobs well and create lots of beings capable of staying honest and doing the right thing – even when leaned on by a criminal to do otherwise.

Spiritually advanced beings, such as those which can be created using Scientology, should be able to independently verify the data relayed to us by LRH as well as current news. I have not, however, located anyone willing to do this openly. Thus, in the minds of most readers, including myself, all the stories circulating on the internet are interesting but cannot be verified as true. That means they tend to be over-discussed.

What is really going on?

The major difference between current mainstream media and the alternative media sources on the internet is that the mainstream has almost totally lost it sense of curiosity and incredulity, whereas the alternative media has not.

Therefore, someone wishing to feed false data into the various internet communities has to be much more creative and resourceful than someone feeding the mainstream.

By all accounts, attempts to deceive and inject false data into the “alternative” communities started long before the internet did. It probably started, this time around, with an infiltration of the “psychical” movement of the 1800s, and of its institutions, such as the Theosophical Society. Some commentators maintain that the whole New Age push – and some include Scientology in that category, though I don't – was a psychological operation cooked up by the very fascists it purports to repudiate! I myself am persuaded by this argument.

Yet certain individuals continued to push forward, intrigued by the obvious fact that governments and the mainstream media were lying to us, but unsure of just what they were trying to accomplish.

As a result, a variety of websites with various points of view have arisen and gained followers. Most of these could be considered media outlets, thought some specialize in interviews while others specialize in relaying data for special sources.

Project Camelot

One of the first sources of information on these topics that I found was Project Camelot. And it is a very valuable source. Not because of the quality of the data necessarily, but because of its volume, scope, and diversity. On this site you can find enough face-to-face interviews with enough witnesses to gain certainty that SOMETHING is going on that officialdom is not talking about.

Bill Ryan, a Brit and the male half of the original Camelot team, had studied Scientology, but is an enemy of the church. This gave him an odd viewpoint on the data, including the idea that the church had actually aligned with one of the major political players on earth and was going along with one of the deceptive story lines being sold to the public. I saw no signs from my years in the Sea Org that this is true.

The Camelot interviews include many that support the idea that ET contact has been made and formalized and kept secret, and that a variety of secret projects have arisen as a result of those contacts and the wish of various factions to create “super men” to fight on their behalf.

In recent years, Bill Ryan developed a contact with someone claiming to work for a secret group based in the City of London (international banking). In this process, he was cut off from his partner Kerry Cassidy. She became aligned with the Richard Hoagland group, and has remained active and vocal, but with info that has been heavily criticised by other commentators. Bill Ryan has been relatively quiet since the breakup, but did publish several reports based on data from his contact in the City of London.

Richard C. Hoagland, who specializes in a NASA cover-up story, is science-trained and worked in the world of corporate public relations, before supposedly rebelling and writing a series of books about corporate and governmental cover-ups.

Several other internet commentators also have backgrounds in journalism or media relations. This gives them media savvy and presentation skills that some other commentators can't match. But it also makes them suspicious. Rumors are rampant that the Intelligence Community is heavily involved with media and PR (for PsyOp purposes) and that no one with corporate connections of this type can be counted on to be “clean.”

Another commentator with a similar background is David Icke, from the UK. And add to the list Stephen Cook from Australia, who works with Cosmic Vision News and provides its financial backing, per another commentator (James Gilliland).

Alex Jones with Info Wars and Ben Fulford in Japan also have backgrounds in journalism.

There are also many journalists who have died while covering stories connected to these issues.

Then there are commentators with military and/or intelligence backgrounds:
  • Drake Bailey with Global Voice
  • George Noory and others with Coast to Coast AM
  • Gordon Duff with Veterans Today
  • John Moore – the Liberty Man Radio Show
  • Rayelan Russbacher with Rumor Mill News
  • Anonymous whistle blowers with White Hats Report

There are a huge number of commentators who come from the world of esoterica and psychic ability. Many of them claim to have been contacted by ET individuals or groups. Some of them were not willing contacts.
  • Billy Meier – FIGU – The Semjase / Plejaren material
  • Laura Knight – Signs of the Times / Cassiopaean material
  • Sheldan Nidle – Planetary Activation Organization / Galactic Federation of Light contacts
  • Jelaila Starr – Nibiruan Council / Emotional Clearing
  • Alex Collier – Andromeda Council
  • Tolec – Andromeda Council
  • Cobra – Resistance Movement
  • Michael Ellegion – the Spiritual Hierarchy
  • Marshall Vian Summers – human sovereignty / Allies of Humanity

Then there are the academics who got involved in this field:
  • Courtney Brown – scientific remote viewing
  • Richard Dolan – history of UFO sightings
  • Steven Greer (a doctor) – disclosure of ET contacts
  • Michael Cremo – anomalies in archeology
  • David Jacobs – ET abductees
  • Karla Turner – ET abductees – died at age 48

One of the most detailed stories concerning the military – and the impetus behind this article – was published at Veterans Today on 31 October by Gordon Duff.

"US military planned mutiny on the Bounty to topple Obama"

It concerns the activities of an extremist faction in the military connected to ex-Nazis and Zionists. Here are some bullet points from that article:
  • ... dozens of key officers face firing, hundreds are under investigation, all with direct ties to extremist elements in the Republican Party and the Israeli lobby.
  • The Air Force moved against the Bush administration in 2007 when it loaded up to nine nuclear weapons on a B-52 aircraft at Minot Air Force Base. This was the Air Force part of a joint operation that is said to have involved 5th Fleet commander, Admiral Cosgriff.
  • Cosgriff was reported to the Secretary of State by Gwyneth Todd, then Chief Political Advisor to the fleet. Todd, who has recently retold her story to the Washington Post and other media outlets, received a death threat this morning after a stalking incident against her by an FBI agent stationed at the US embassy in Canberra, Australia.
  • Similarly, top defense consultant John Wheeler III, who knew of these issues quite well was mysteriously murdered and his body found in a garbage heap in Delaware in late 2010.
  • Today, key members of the military more loyal to Israel and Wall Street than the United States are said to be planning a mutiny to take place after the presidential election.
  • Their task, upon seizing power, is to facilitate a massive terror attack inside the United States, possibly using a stolen nuclear weapon, declare martial law, move troops into Iraq and to attack Iran with aid from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
  • This is the plan, it is known, not just in the Department of Defense, but by all intelligence agencies, the plotters have all been recognized, are all under surveillance and they have not been very careful.
  • Those involved in the plot, those outside the military, are those who are spreading “conspiracy theory” rumors about US complicity or malfeasance in the handling of the murder of the US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens.
  • The planned overthrow and subsequent declaration of martial law is a massively financed operation with billions of dollars available. The primary impetus for this action is a belief by members in the “dispensationalist” pseudo-Christian heresy that pervades America’s military service academies that the United States should be subservient to the State of Israel. Over the past three decades, religious extremists have taken over the Air Force Academy, Annapolis and West Point, teaching mandatory classes in obscure religious beliefs, hatred of Islam and stressing obedience to an “Apocalypse Cult” that stresses preemptive nuclear war in order to bring on the “end times” and destroy all life on earth.
Other storytellers, other stories
It would be reasonable to suspect that the military, from its leadership on down, is divided regarding purposes and allegiances. But the various stories out there concerning the military don't make this clear.
The mainstream media tells the story of a military at war with terrorism. So this is the story that the traditional power structure wants the population to accept.
External threat
Part of the alternate media paints a picture of a military heavily involved in protecting the planet against an ET (or similar) threat that it is keeping secret. Sources telling various versions of this story include Kerry Cassidy, John Moore, and John Kettler. These sources speak of a military that has been secretly cooperating with its counterparts in other countries for much longer than it has been openly doing so. It is a hopeful scenario in that it portends global cooperation. But the estimates of the seriousness of the external threat vary widely. Some commentators maintain that there is none (highly unlikely) while others maintain that we are totally defenseless against it.
Of course, most service members would not be aware of any of this.
Freedom fighters
A variation of the external threat scenario has the primary enemy on planet earth, but secret the way ET would be. This is the “dark cabal” mentioned by Sheldan Nidle's Galactic Federation of Light. It is also the “cabal” or “Nazis” mentioned by Ben Fulford, who makes no mention of ET in his stories. Drake names a similar enemy of Mankind.
In this scenario, “White Hat” factions exist in the military, government, business, and the ET world (where its existence is recognized). They are constantly trying to restrain and trip up the “dark” faction, who, without the existence of the White Hats would have brought the planet to its knees long ago. Many commentators speak of a denouement to this struggle occurring shortly.
Many readers do not support the idea that this will end well, as they see little evidence of this on the ground.
Internal threat
This leads us to the commentators who think the fascists will not be stopped any time soon. They usually base their opinions on mainstream news sources and secret internal sources, so their data is biased. But they have a large following, because most of them (until recently) never mention ET or New Age mumbo-jumbo so their stories are easier to believe.
Though it seems impossible that a whole army could be turned against its own people, there is historical precedence for this (Nazi Germany).
Alex Jones is one commentator pushing the idea that the U.S. Military is being manipulated by a fascistic power faction which he calls “the globalists.” This corresponds roughly to the faction Gordon Duff is talking about. This story goes back at least to the late 1970s and Dr. Peter Beter's “audio letters” in which he speaks of the “hawks” trying to start a shooting war with Russia. However, Gordon has been fed a “UFO War in the Pacific” story that John Kettler is also covering, which could ruin his credibility if it proves false (which it probably will). Drake insists this story is “horse hockey” though he also speaks openly about ET. Kerry Cassidy has shown some interest in the story, but is skeptical.
Where is the truth?
Most old hands in the study of human stories and how they form agree that a story gains credibility by containing an element of truth. It it likely that all these stories have some truth in them. Every commentator seems pretty sure that they understand the situation better than the others. It trust those the most, though, who trust their sources the least. Or who don't bother and just get on with doing something useful in the world.
The truth is that people have to be helpful and productive in their daily lives, or this society will collapse like a house made of cards. Most of these internet commentators are trying to be helpful and productive. Most people think they are being helpful and productive. However, people in the mainstream media should know better. People in the intelligence community should know better. And people who suspect or know they are working for criminals should know better. That includes huge sections of the financial industry, but also big sections of the military. The interesting thing about the military is that they have weapons and are trained to use them. So they are in a position to do something about criminality in society on a level that the criminals can understand.
But will they?
The role of the individual
Groups are made up of people. Groups act because people act. Groups can do things that individuals can't when they act in a coordinated manner. Yet the building blocks of groups are, without question, individuals.
I have gone over in my articles on The Model how a human being works similar to a robot. When the machine (the body) is under complete control of the being that is supposed to be controlling it, it normally behaves sanely. But when the automatic control programs are broken into and interfered with, anything from subtle changes to total self-destruction can result. And the being that leaves the body is seldom in better shape than when it entered.
Until now. For now we have the technologies of Scientology and allied practices to repair the being while it is in a body by utilizing its innate ability to become aware of and alter or erase its own programming. This seems to be a revolutionary approach to the human problem and to have great potential when done correctly. This gives us the hope that some day we can have sane leaders who will build powerful groups that cannot be “hacked” and taken over by criminal elements. This is what is needed on earth, and on any planet like earth. My group, if I may speak for it, definitely intends for things to turn out this way.
As I have mentioned before, I invite readers who are interested in these technologies to visit the Volunteer Ministers website for an introduction.

01 September, 2012


Origins of body forms - energetic or light bodies illustrated.

Here is a complete re-think on the subject of “evolution” which includes Hubbard's data along with some from other sources. It's a rough outline of possibilities, even though definitive language is sometimes used in the interest of brevity and clarity.

Star Body

The simplest structure and function of anything that could be called a “body” (and it is in astronomy) is the star. This consists of a radiative point-source, constantly on. Its appearance depends on the quality of the energy being radiated. We normally judge “appearance” on the basis of just one octave of frequencies which we call “visible light.” As detectors for non-visible emissions are proliferating in space (and on earth) we are beginning to become more used to the idea of spectral ranges. We have developed a common way of visualizing spectral ranges by mapping them to colors within the visible band. This mapping can result in “false-color” images of cosmic bodies that are often quite beautiful. 

The ability to fully sense several octaves of radiative energy at one time is currently considered a higher spiritual ability.

The star body pattern is exceedingly simple and rather easy to mechanize. Most stellar objects we see today are not real star bodies, but star machines. Though the internal structure of a star machine can be quite simple, it is not necessarily so. The only person I know of who has seriously questioned current science on this point (in relation to our own sun in particular) is James Horak. Learn more here: James Horak blog

Basic Energetic Tools

The two basic energy-related tools are 1) the beam and 2) the shield.

The beam would normally be thought of as an “offensive” tool, and the shield a “defensive” tool.

I am guessing that the beam developed first, as primal beings gave no thought to self-defense.

Beams come in two main types: 1) pressor and 2) tractor. The pressor pushes out like a fire hose and is the more ancient type (offensive). 

The tractor pulls in like a winch and is likely of more recent development (defensive). 

Beams should be seen as different than a simple flow of energy (discharge), for the definition of a beam implies some ability to control the extent of its reach (length) and thus some way to sense whatever is at its farthest point.

Ultimately, a hybrid pressor-tractor beam was developed that combines both functions in one tool. This is an extremely common machine element.

The shield in its earliest forms was probably mirror-like and was likely used for deceptive offensive purposes or to bounce an energy flow back towards its source. As it developed, it was given a wide variety of energetic properties. It appears in modern machines mostly as a protective or aesthetic covering.


In its purest form, the orb consists of a star body surrounded by a spherical shield. Though this seems like a relatively simple structure, creating a workable shield was problematic for the being, and led to a wide variety of creative designs.

The problem with a “perfect” shield is that, while it affords a “perfect” defense, it also results in complete isolation from the rest of the universe. In the interest of combating boredom and having a game, this was not considered optimum. Thus, various methods were devised to allow the being inside its shield to communicate with its outside environment.

The orb model (the cell) is the basis on which all of modern biological machinery is built. It is also the basic pattern for the non-radiative planet. Change the shield from a solid shell to a thick atmosphere, and you get a “gas giant” like Jupiter.

Again, most cosmic bodies observed today are machines, not real beings.

Hybrid shapes

Today the Star in its purity is never seen used as a body. Is is too expansive to be used in that way. Only star machines remain, potent symbols for the potential reach and freedom of the spirits that made them long ago.

All “practical” bodies are shielded. The simplest shapes consist of a central orb with one or more attached combo-beams.

Early designs were of a simple radiate nature and still abound today in the ocean. Later designs reduced the number of attached beams to some specific number, then specialized the beams to perform specific tasks.

Hybrid or compound forms were developed.

Thus, the human arm is a compound jointed beam. And the head is an orb-beam hybrid, combining several sensory and communication functions into one appendage.

A “modern” biological body includes several sub-systems often referred to as “chakras”. The use of chakras in esoteric spiritual practices is, in my view, somewhat misplaced. Almost all technology left on earth by higher beings concerns itself with bodies and how they are constructed and controlled. Ditto for most “occult” symbolism. 

The snake and staff, for instance, is a symbol for coitus (as a mechanism).

The accompanying figure illustrates the evolution of body shapes from pure energy forms (light bodies) through fine mechanical forms (doll bodies) into heavy mechanical forms (robots) and biological forms (meat bodies). Only bodies serving as vessels for higher beings are shown here.

Types of bodies used by advanced beings, this universe.

Plants and animals are thought to have been developed as playthings for “the rich and famous” so to speak. Until meat bodies were designed that could survive unsupervised, there was no need for concepts such as “food” or “food chain.” The “ecosystem” is a relatively recent development and speaks to the urge of higher beings to put the whole game of life on automatic. 

This is a withdrawal from creation and is not really necessary.

Humanoid forms

There is some evidence that the humanoid form evolved from a basic five-beamed orb design.

If we take the “light body” to be the most ancient humanoid form (this might not be true) then we see that even this type tends to take the form of a central body with a head, two arms and two legs.

Robot bodies are reported by Hubbard, but are not much seen today. This must mean that they have been discarded as undesirable for all except a few specific purposes or that we are unable to recognize them because they are shielded to look like doll bodies, the same as has been done with some primitive earth robots.

Biological bodies are by far the most numerous these days, though persistent reports of “crystal” bodies make them a glaring exception to the rule. It is unclear whether these are an actual silicon-based life form, or merely apparitions produced by the more psychically advanced ETs. There is evidence on earth (diatoms) of experiments with silicate-shielded biological bodies, in addition to the calcium-based structures that we know as shell and bone.

Several authors (or contactees) have classified humanoid body types according to their nearest animal analog. This could well be a running joke amongst the star people, as it is impossible for us to know at this time exactly how these various body types were developed.

Presumably the various different types were suited to the various different worlds where they were initially developed. There is also some evidence, stated as fact by “Airl” in Alien Interview, that all known space opera societies have lost the technology of creating bodies “from scratch” and now struggle to develop hybrids - that can survive in new environments - from existing materials. 

Simon Parkes suggests that this is the primary interest of ET in earth humans. We are a robust form due to the heavy gravity here and the relative reproductive freedom which we enjoy, so remain attractive as a “slave species” regardless of the moral repercussions that has had for past planetary rulers, and the apparently hopeless nature of any long-term plan to enslave higher beings.

I am a bit aghast to think that some ET groups might still consider this a viable option, but we have never been know for being wise in this regard.


Characterized by hairless, even scaly, skin, and slit eyes. This is the predominant body form of the most ancient space opera societies, which still seem to be dominant in the universe at this time (regardless of rumors to the contrary).

Those societies have developed advanced forms of mind control that appear to us as psychic and physical abilities. The degree to which these are machine (electronics)-assisted is uncertain at this time. The Reptoids are described by their enemies as vicious, heartless beings. And they have many enemies.

Body types range from extremely muscular (for use in heavy-gravity environments) to extremely skinny (such as the Tall Grays). They are associated somewhat with the feminine, which is seen as the “creator” aspect of the higher being.

There are legends that an earlier creator race existed, sometimes known as "eagle beings." They reportedly have no definite form, taking whatever shape suits their immediate purpose.


Characterized by very hairy bodies, though this impression may be due in part to masks and costumes. Their distant relatives, which appear occasionally on earth, are reportedly from Mars and known to us as “bigfoot” and by other names. The Dog people are known for body strength and as the forefathers of earth humans. They are associated somewhat with the masculine, which is the “destroyer” aspect of the higher being. 

They are known, traditionally, as warriors. But they are reported to take many forms and play many roles in various space opera societies.


Similar to the dog body type, but with slit eyes that are larger. Probably some sort of dog-reptoid cross, as are cats on earth. Possibly the “feminine” (reptoid) form of the Dog.


Another ancient race similar in capabilities to the reptoids, but with huge eyes which seem to be composed of sensor arrays, as are insect eyes on earth. Their hands only have four “fingers.”

These are reported as taking an extremely thin doll body form. I know of no evidence that this body type ever went biological, but that could be wrong.


Humans are thought to be a Dog-Reptoid cross (hybrid). The body supposedly was developed back when genetic engineering was more widely known and practiced.

Though some date this body type as having existed in the universe for millions of years, others report that genetic modifications to it on earth date back to as recently as a few thousand years ago. These modifications were supposedly perpetrated by reptoid “giants” in a few select areas of the planet, possibly only the Middle East, or the area just north of there. Data about these beings can be found in Barry Chamish's book Return of the Giants

Again, genetics seems to be a huge concern for these beings. 

It is not clear that any giant hybrids survived on earth. There is some evidence that they were quite carefully eradicated thousands of years ago.

The male human, being somewhat more hairy than the female, is traditionally associated with the ancient masculine aspects, as were the Dog people. This seems to have been a deliberate design decision.

In a similar manner, the female is more associated with the traditional feminine aspects.

Star people. Thank you to the artists who made these drawings and sculptures.


These should be mentioned here, as this whole article came about as I was thinking of how the chakras are involved in singing. Esoterically known as “energy centers,” the body chakras are the primary muscle sub-systems of the body.

The lowest of these are the reproductive muscles. In the male this consists of a rod which serves as a kind of pipe. In the female, we have the opposite apparatus, a sleeve which receives the flow from the pipe, as well as the uterus and all the rest of it. This is the biggest male-female body difference and is a timeless symbol of how opposites combine to form a unity. But realize, that while this concept can be elevated to grand esoteric meanings, it essentially describes a basic mechanical design widely known in electronics as “plug and jack.” 

In the seven chakra system, the uterus gets a separate chakra, which is usually associated with the gonads in the male, or the spleen. The lowest chakra is usually described as being located at the bottom of the spine (tail bone).

Next up is the diaphragm or “stomach” chakra. Though the digestive organs are sometimes included in this chakra, they are a much more passive sub-system than the diaphragm, which must be kept in constant motion to keep the body breathing.

The heart is a very important sub-system and chakra. Its esoteric importance is much over-stated, I believe. Its importance to the body, however, is extremely obvious. From a body design point of view, this is a critical chakra and must be kept “strong.”

The throat contains the vocal folds as well as a control system that switches between breathing and ingestion. It is an essential sub-system in many ways, and of course is crucial to human verbal communication.

The sub-systems of the head have been broken down in a variety of ways. The head chakras feature subtlety of control over force. Considerable coordination activities are directed from the head area, which also serves as a general-purpose communication device.

The major muscle systems of the head are the mouth and eyes, not counting the neck and face. However, the chakras emphasized in esoteric teachings have to do with the various brain areas: primitive-pineal and sensate-analytical.

In humans the pineal is vestigial, and much attention is paid to “activating” it. Some teachings stress its importance to body health. Others see it as a spiritual center. As far as I can tell, the pineal was originally intended to provide a telepathic link between bodies and their masters. It was used extensively by earlier humanoids, before the reptoids came in and reduced its size.

The seven chakra system does not include the “third eye” chakra, or combines it with the “crown” chakra. The “third eye” is a visible organ in many reptiles and is vestigial in cats and many other animals. It apparently affords additional sensory capabilities, and can be rehabilitated in humans, according to yoga practitioners.

The “crown” chakra symbolizes the superiority of the spirit more than anything else. Traditionally, it cannot be activated until all the other chakras are brought into balance or “harmony.” However, Hubbard never reported any problems with accessing spiritual abilities that could not be solved with auditing techniques.

In the world of body design, the “crown” could refer to the lower-order spritual entity that must be present for the body to operate properly and appear “alive.” Most animal bodies will function “normally” with this entity (Hubbard called it the Genetic Entity or GE) present. However, a humanoid body will not function properly in the absence of a higher being. Under such conditions, it normally dies either immediately or in a period of hours, or perhaps days if kept on life support. 

The GE is apparently unable, or unwilling, to run a humanoid body by itself. After all, this is not how this body type was designed to operate. It was always designed as a vessel for a more advanced being to use, even if that more advanced being had the rank of slave in its society.

The requirement that two beings are needed to run a humanoid body has been a confusion that has kept humanoid societies in almost continuous trouble since bodies were first invented. But I have faith that with adequate education and processing, this confusion can be resolved.

31 August, 2012

Running out of breathing room?

I get some amazing quotes sent to me because of some of the mailing lists I'm on, and here's another one (I have added emphasis):

We happen to be going through, temporarily, momentarily, only for an instant, a period when Man has made himself relatively free by the use of a machine.

A period which just succeeds after a period when he was terribly enslaved by a machine: the industrial—early days of industrialism with their twelve-, fourteen- hour days, with their smoke-belching factories that were eating out the lungs and wits of everybody in them.

That was a pretty grim period.

He had moved from one kind of slavery to another kind of slavery.

All right, he’s moved out of that.

This era is just succeeding that—

and just before the machine is employed for his utter enslavement.

The reason you’ve got Scientology is, to a large degree,

because it’s right here that there’s a breathing period on Earth.

Just a little breathing period.

I don’t know how many years it is from here to the other, but you’ve already seen it begin. You’ve already seen the second slavery stage start

and it started with Hiroshima.

L. Ron Hubbard

From the Philadelphia Doctorate Course (1952), Lecture #21

ARC/Cycles: Theory and Automaticity